Florida Department of Revenue Audit Notices Sent out to Motor Vehicle Dealers

Florida’s DR-840 Notice of Intent to Audit Books and Records for Motor Vehicle Dealers

What is the DR-840 Notice of Intent to Audit?

The Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) issues Form DR-840, Notice of Intent to Audit Books and Records, as a formal notification to businesses that they have been selected for a sales and use tax audit. For motor vehicle dealers, this audit is particularly significant because of the complexities involved in sales tax collection, trade-ins, financing arrangements, and exemption certificates. This document serves as the official commencement of the audit process, providing details about the audit period, the specific taxes that will be examined, and the records that the business is expected to provide for review. Once a dealership receives this notice, they are granted a 60-day waiting period before the Department of Revenue can officially begin the audit, unless the business voluntarily chooses to waive this waiting period.

This 60-day preparatory period is an essential window of time that motor vehicle dealers should utilize strategically to evaluate their compliance with Florida’s sales and use tax laws, gather relevant financial documentation, and identify any areas of potential exposure before the actual audit begins. Many dealers underestimate the complexities involved in a sales tax audit, and failing to take full advantage of this preparatory phase can result in unexpected tax assessments, substantial penalties, and financial liabilities that could have been mitigated with proper planning and organization.

Key Information Motor Vehicle Dealers Need to Know About the DR-840

Why Was Your Dealership Selected for an Audit?

The Florida Department of Revenue selects motor vehicle dealerships for sales tax audits for several reasons. Some of the most common factors that may trigger an audit include:

• High volume of exempt sales, particularly trade-ins and sales to out-of-state buyers.
• Discrepancies between reported sales tax collections and financial records, such as federal income tax returns or bank statements.
• Incorrect handling of tax-exempt sales, such as those involving resale certificates, nonprofit organizations, or government agencies.
• Previous audits revealing errors or non-compliance, leading to increased scrutiny.
• Third-party data sources, such as 1099-K credit card sales reports, flagging potential underreporting.
• Customer complaints or whistleblower reports alleging that the dealership is improperly handling sales tax.
• Misapplication of sales tax to dealer fees, warranties, and lease transactions.
• Unreported sales due to reliance on incorrect accounting practices or software issues.

What Happens After Receiving the DR-840?

1. The 60-Day Waiting Period
   • Once the DR-840 notice has been issued, the Florida Department of Revenue is legally prohibited from beginning the audit for a minimum of 60 days, unless the business voluntarily waives this right.
   • It is highly recommended that dealerships do not waive this waiting period. Instead, they should use this time to thoroughly review their sales tax compliance, organize all necessary documentation, and consult with professionals if necessary.
   • Dealerships should conduct a detailed internal audit to assess areas where they may have tax exposure, such as misclassified trade-ins, missing exemption certificates, or incorrect taxation on fees.
2. Preparing for the Audit
   • To ensure a smooth audit process, dealerships should proactively gather all relevant tax and financial records that the auditor may request, including:
     • Vehicle sales records, including details of trade-ins, lease transactions, and cash sales.
     • Properly completed exemption certificates for tax-exempt sales.
     • Bank statements, credit card processing reports, and 1099-K forms.
     • Purchase records demonstrating that appropriate sales tax was paid.
     • Federal and state income tax returns to reconcile reported sales.
     • Documentation of dealer fees, warranties, and aftermarket product sales.
     • Any contracts with third-party vendors and service providers that may involve taxable transactions.
   • Areas of potential exposure that dealerships should review include:
     • Sales tax compliance on trade-in allowances and documentation—ensuring all required paperwork is in place.
     • Proper documentation for out-of-state vehicle sales, particularly shipping records proving that vehicles were delivered outside Florida.
     • Handling of down payments and deposits—verifying that sales tax is collected appropriately when funds become non-refundable.
     • Accurate application of sales tax on extended warranties, service contracts, and gap insurance.
     • Proper handling of lease transactions, including tax treatment on capitalized costs and residual values.
     • Ensuring reported taxable sales match bank deposits and financing records to prevent discrepancies.
     • Confirming that use tax has been properly accounted for on vehicle inventory purchases when sales tax was not charged by the seller.

Common Pitfalls in Sales Tax Audits for Motor Vehicle Dealers

Dealerships often assume they are in full compliance, only to discover significant tax liabilities during an audit. Some of the most common errors found in dealership sales tax audits include:

• Failure to collect and retain valid exemption certificates for tax-exempt sales, such as sales to out-of-state buyers, government entities, or nonprofit organizations.
• Incorrect application of sales tax to trade-ins, leading to over- or underpayment of tax.
• Not charging sales tax on required dealer fees and service contracts, resulting in potential liability.
• Discrepancies between reported taxable sales and financial records, such as tax returns and bank statements.
• Lack of proper documentation for taxable purchases, causing the Department of Revenue to assess additional tax liabilities.
• Failure to self-assess and remit use tax on purchases from out-of-state vendors who did not charge Florida sales tax.
• Incorrect classification of taxable transactions, leading to unintended tax liabilities.
• Inadequate documentation of dealer incentives, rebates, or financing promotions, which may result in taxable sales adjustments.

The Audit Process After the 60-Day Period

1. Opening Interview
   • The audit process officially begins with an opening conference between the auditor and the dealership’s representative.
   • During this meeting, the auditor will seek to gain a broad understanding of the dealership’s sales, financing, and tax collection processes.
   • Dealerships should be cautious about providing unnecessary information—only answer what is specifically requested and ensure all statements are accurate.
2. Review of Sales and Purchases
   • The auditor will analyze both sales and purchases to confirm that taxes were properly collected and remitted.
   • If purchase documentation is missing or incomplete, the auditor may assess use tax on inventory or dealership expenses where sales tax was not originally collected.
   • The auditor will often compare reported taxable sales with bank deposits, financing agreements, and credit card processing statements to detect discrepancies.
3. Sampling and Estimation Methods
   • Auditors frequently use sampling techniques to estimate tax liability for the entire audit period.
   • Financial records, such as federal tax returns and bank statements, may be used as a basis for estimating unreported sales.
   • Credit card merchant statements (1099-K reports) may also be examined to identify potential underreporting.
   • Dealerships may challenge sampling periods if they believe they are not representative of actual business activity.

Why This Matters and How to Protect Your Dealership

• Never ignore a DR-840 notice—failure to respond or prepare can result in estimated tax assessments that may be significantly higher than actual liabilities.
• Use the 60-day period effectively by conducting an internal compliance review, gathering necessary records, and seeking professional assistance.
• Provide only the required documentation—oversharing can sometimes lead to additional scrutiny and tax liability.
• Maintain organized and complete records of all sales, purchases, trade-ins, and exemption certificates to defend against tax assessments.
• Seek expert guidance—Florida’s sales tax laws for motor vehicle dealers are complex, and even small errors can result in costly penalties.

Florida’s DR-1215 Notice of Intent to Make Audit Changes for Motor Vehicle Dealers

Understanding the DR-1215 Notice and What It Means for Motor Vehicle Dealers

The Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) issues Form DR-1215, Notice of Intent to Make Audit Changes, as a preliminary notification outlining the proposed adjustments resulting from a sales and use tax audit. This notice typically follows an extensive review of records and signals that the auditor has identified potential tax liabilities related to sales tax reporting, trade-ins, exempt sales, dealer fees, and use tax compliance.

For motor vehicle dealers, the DR-1215 is a critical stage in the audit process, as it provides an opportunity to review and dispute the auditor’s findings before the audit assessment is finalized. Given the complexities of dealership transactions—including trade-ins, out-of-state sales, leasing arrangements, and finance-related charges—motor vehicle dealers must carefully analyze the DR-1215 to ensure errors are corrected before they become final tax assessments. The consequences of failing to dispute incorrect findings can result in substantial financial penalties, increased liabilities, and even regulatory complications that could impact dealership operations.

Why Motor Vehicle Dealers Receive a DR-1215 Notice

Dealerships are commonly audited due to the high volume of taxable transactions and exemptions within their industry. The DR-1215 is typically issued when auditors identify potential discrepancies, including:

• Errors in trade-in allowances—misapplying sales tax exemptions on vehicle trade-ins.
• Failure to properly document out-of-state sales—lacking valid proof of vehicle delivery outside Florida, which can result in assessments on otherwise exempt sales.
• Incorrect sales tax collection on dealer fees, warranties, and service contracts—leading to underpayment or overpayment of sales tax.
• Unreported or underreported taxable transactions, including cash sales, in-house financing transactions, and lease agreements.
• Use tax liabilities on inventory, shop equipment, office supplies, and courtesy vehicles—where tax was not collected at the time of purchase.
• Inconsistencies between reported taxable sales and financial records, such as discrepancies between tax returns, sales reports, and bank deposits.
• Misclassification of taxable transactions, such as improperly designating taxable sales as exempt or failing to account for add-on dealer fees.
• Failure to self-assess and remit use tax on business purchases, particularly for vehicle inventory items or dealer equipment purchased from out-of-state vendors.

In many cases, auditors may rely on estimation techniques and sampling periods to extrapolate potential underpayments across the entire audit period. If an auditor selects a three-month period where mistakes were found, they may apply the same ratio of errors to all dealership transactions for multiple years, resulting in exaggerated tax assessments.

How Motor Vehicle Dealers Should Respond to the DR-1215

Step 1: Review the Findings Carefully

• The A Exhibits of the DR-1215 focus on sales transactions, outlining taxable sales and adjustments the auditor believes should have been reported.
• The B Exhibits cover purchases and use tax liabilities, assessing whether the dealership properly paid sales tax on business expenses and inventory.
• Dealerships should carefully examine the auditor’s methodology, ensuring that any assumptions or estimates are accurate.
• If trade-ins, dealer fees, or extended warranty transactions were incorrectly assessed, gather supporting documentation to counter the findings.
• Compare the auditor’s findings to your dealership’s general ledger, DMS reports, bank deposits, and credit card processing statements to verify that reported sales match financial records.

Step 2: Identify Documentation Gaps

• Ensure trade-in records properly show tax-exempt reductions in the taxable sales price and that all paperwork meets Florida’s requirements.
• Verify that all out-of-state sales have corresponding bill of lading, buyer affidavits, and delivery confirmation to prove non-Florida taxability.
• Confirm that dealer fees, service contracts, warranties, and add-ons were taxed correctly and separately from the vehicle sales price when necessary.
• If auditors relied on sampling methods, request details on how the sample period was selected and whether it represents normal business operations.
• Review all resale certificates on file to confirm that they meet Florida’s requirements and were valid at the time of the transaction.

Step 3: Request an Audit Conference

• Dealerships have 30 days to formally request a DR-1215 audit conference to contest findings before the assessment becomes final.
• If the auditor used incorrect assumptions, submit corrective documentation to challenge the findings.
• Dispute overly broad sample period estimates by presenting records that more accurately reflect taxable sales.
• Bring in a tax professional with experience handling Florida dealership audits to ensure your response is structured effectively.
• Use the conference to highlight inconsistencies, errors, or missing context that could result in an excessive tax liability.

Step 4: Provide Only What’s Necessary

• Do not submit excessive documentation—focus on the specific issues outlined in the DR-1215.
• Avoid exposing additional transactions that could inadvertently increase your dealership’s tax liability.
• Present records that directly dispute audit adjustments while ensuring compliance with Florida tax statutes.
• Ensure all provided documents align with previous sales tax returns and financial filings to prevent auditors from expanding their review.

Step 5: Negotiate Penalty Reductions

• If the assessment includes steep penalties, negotiate reductions by demonstrating good-faith compliance and a willingness to correct errors.
• If the issues stem from unclear guidance or software miscalculations, request a reasonable cause penalty waiver.
• Dealerships that made errors but did not willfully evade tax may qualify for penalty mitigation, reducing overall liabilities.

Long-Term Compliance Strategies for Dealerships

To avoid similar issues in future audits, dealerships should implement comprehensive sales tax compliance strategies, including:

• Routine internal audits to ensure transactions are being reported correctly and that documentation is properly maintained.
• Up-to-date training for sales and finance staff to ensure proper tax collection on dealer fees, warranties, and trade-ins.
• Regularly verifying resale certificates and tax exemption documentation to ensure compliance with Florida’s rules.
• Accurately documenting out-of-state sales and trade-in transactions to prevent unnecessary assessments in future audits.
• Implementing accounting software that properly tracks sales, trade-ins, and taxable transactions, ensuring audit readiness.

Key Takeaways for Motor Vehicle Dealers

• The DR-1215 is not final—it’s a chance to correct errors before the assessment becomes official.
• Review trade-in documentation and out-of-state sales records to dispute misclassified transactions.
• Challenge auditor estimations based on limited sample periods to avoid overstated tax liabilities.
• Negotiate penalty reductions if errors were accidental or due to unclear tax rules.
• Consult with a sales tax expert to strategically respond and minimize financial exposure.

By proactively responding to the DR-1215, motor vehicle dealers can avoid unnecessary tax liabilities and protect their business from financial strain. Understanding Florida’s tax rules, maintaining proper records, and strategically disputing audit findings can help dealerships successfully navigate the sales tax audit process and reduce overall financial risk.

.